Home » Blog

Controller King

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Xbox360 Controller vs. PS3 Dual-Shock Controller – who will reign king? We completely feel that there is a clear answer here, details provided:

King of the Controllers

Ever since the emergence of Sony’s Playstation 3 and Microsoft’s XBOX 360, there has been an entertaining debate over which system has better peripherals, namely the ever-used controller. Many critics have argued that the PS3 Dual-shock remote is a classier, more elegant controller, that offers battery recharging and ease of use. However, I beg to differ that Microsoft’s XBOX 360 remote is by all means superior.

xbox360controller

Who really wants to charge their remotes? I mean c’mon!? I own the Xbox360 while my brother owns the PS3, and let me tell you, whenever I want to use his Playstation the god-damn controller is dead, then I have to look for the power-charging cord, then I cant find it, then I don’t end up playing! Geez, never thought playing video games would be so difficult. The controller was actually dead – power cord was nowhere in sight and I literally couldn’t even play because of that. Even more so, when I did find the powercord, I had to sit about 2 feet away from my TV because the power cord isn’t any longer than that….

I went to Costco about a year ago and bought a 30 pack of AA batteries for my XBOX controllers that I’m nearly half way through at the moment- batteries out? No problem, I swap them out in about 15 seconds. You can even buy a recharging kit for a small price – HEY, at least you have some options here. I also need to mention that the curves of the Xbox360 controller are much more appealing in my opinion. I immediately fell in love as it is truly a piece of ‘gaming art’. The grip is excellent, while the remote has a great feel of substance. The PS3 remote hasn’t changed since the emergence of the Playstation 2. Honestly, they could have done something to it besides make it even lighter and feel even crappier.

ps3controller

Price wise, you could pick up a XBOX 360 controller for $49.99, while the PS3 controller retails for $54.99. Sounds like a good deal to me. Of course you can always shop at one of our favorite sites like eBay.com or Amazon.com to try and find a bargain.

Historically speaking, we must say we are pretty disappointed with Sony here. The PS3 controller is almost completely unchanged since the inception of Sony’s last console, the PS2. Thank you Microsoft for listening to us gamers – you have truly perfected the shape of the controller, and we name you the Controller King!

controllers

King of the Controllers
Ever since the emergence of Sony’s Playstation 3 and Microsoft’s XBOX 360, there has been an entertaining debate over which system has better peripherals, namely the ever-used controller. Many critics have argued that the PS3 Dual-shock remote is a classier, more elegant controller, that offers battery recharging and ease of use. However, I beg to differ that Microsoft’s XBOX 360 remote is by all means superior.
Who really wants to charge their remotes? I mean c’mon!? I own the XBOX360 while my brother owns the PS3, and let me tell you, whenever I want to use his Playstation the god-damn controller is dead, then I have to look for the power-charging cord, then I cant find it, then I don’t end up playing! Geez, never thought playing video games would be so difficult. The controller was actually dead – power cord was nowhere in sight and I literally couldn’t even play because of that. Even more so, when I did find the powercord, I had to sit about 2 feet away from my TV because the power cord isn’t any longer than that….
I went to Costco about a year ago and bought a 30 pack of AA batteries for my XBOX controllers that I’m nearly half way through at the moment- batteries out? No problem, I swap them out in about 15 seconds. You can even buy a recharging kit for a small price – HEY, at least you have some options here. I also need to mention that the curves of the XBOX controller are much more appealing in my opinion. I immediately fell in love as it is truly a piece of ‘gaming art’. The grip is excellent, while the remote has a great feel of substance. The PS3 remote hasn’t changed since the emergence of the Playstation 2. Honestly, they could have done something to it besides make it even lighter and feel even crappier.
Price wise, you could pick up a XBOX 360 controller for $49.99, while the PS3 controller retails for $54.99. Sounds like a good deal to me. Of course you can always shop at one of our favorite sites like eBay.com or Amazon.com to try and find a bargain.
6 October 2009 2 Comments

2 Comments »

  • KostonDaBeast
    KostonDaBeast said:

    I isagree.Sony stuck with the same design because they got it right the first time around unlike Microsoft who started with their clunker of a controller. Plus, Sony’s internal rechargable battery is smarter than using AAs. They throw off the weight and are bought only to be thrown away after they die. Also they shape is retarded because you have practically stretch your hand to hit the buttons because of the the thing is just a bulge. That’s why the grip is needed: to keep the controller in your hand because its shape causes it to be prone to falling out.

  • Diablov50
    Diablov50 said:

    X box controller is better then the ps3 and the wii, the wii there are too many parts and if you want to play a normal game you have to awkwardly hold the controller. ps3 and xbox are similar but the xbox controller has better placement for non complicated gaming. They should have changed the ps3 controller.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.